Influences and Sources of Theodore Roethkes Elegy for Jane Essay

Influences and Sources of Theodore Roethke's Elegy for Jane In "In Memoriam A. H. H.," a new kind of elegy with roots in the elegiac tradition, Tennyson writes, "For words, like Nature, half reveal/And half conceal the Soul within" (1045). The truth of Tennyson's statement appears in Theodore Roethke's "Elegy for Jane: My Student Killed by a Horse." Roethke conceals much about himself as a person yet reveals much about himself as a poet when he puts his grief into words. Without knowing something of Roethke's personal and professional life, one would think that a student named Jane was the sole inspiration for this moving elegy; however, in The Glass House, the poet's biographer, Allan Seager, reveals more than one possible source of inspiration for the poem. At the University of Washington, as at Roethke's other teaching posts, students liked him, and he frequently formed close relationships with his students--in fact, he married one of his former students; however, this was not the case with Jane Bannick. Seager reveals that "Ted had not known her [Jane] very well." She " was a student of Ted's for only one quarter. She was thrown from a horse and killed" (193). Yet another one of his students may also have had an influence on this elegy. According to Seager, Roethke "may have been influenced also by Lois Lamb, who had fallen from a horse the previous summer and described the attendant fears to him in detail" (193). Seager also mentions that [the poet] and Lamb conducted a series of `experiments' with a flock of turkeys on the sanitarium [Pinel] grounds" (187) during the poet's 1949-50 hospitalization of manic-depressive illness. These visits by Lamb indicate a closer relationship between Roethke and Lamb t... ... us all. We can all relate to it. Thus, drawing not only upon his personal experiences and emotion but also universal emotion as well as elegiac and pastoral traditions, Roethke reveals himself as not only a warm, caring instructor but also as an outstanding, and perhaps instinctive, poet. Works Cited Parini, Jay. Theodore Roethke: An American Romantic. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P, 1979. Roethke, Theodore. The Collected Poems of Theodore Roethke. New York: Anchor-Doubleday, 1975. Ross-Bryant, Lynn. Theodore Roethke: Poetry of the Earth . . . Poet of the Spirit. Port Washington, N.Y.: Kennikat, 1981. Seager, Allan. The Glass House: The Life of Theodore Roethke. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. Tennyson, Alfred Lord. "In Memoriam A. H. H." The Norton Anthology of English Literature, 3rd ed., Vol. 2. New York: Norton, 1974. 1042-84.

Proctors Analysis Essay

‘What is John Proctor? I am no saint; for me it is fraud. I am not that man.† Explore Miller’s Presentation of Proctor in The Crucible. How far do you agree with Proctor’s Analysis of himself?  In 1962, Salem was affected dramatically by the tragedy of witchcraft. Miller use’s this hard-hitting occurrence to structure his story named ‘ The crucible’. By using a real event this can really affect the audience and influence them into picking up more understanding of the play and the happenings that are involved, hence the fact that witchcraft does not seem like a fully believable event. Miller uses the 1692 Salem witchcraft trials to symbolize the 1950s anti-Communist purges. The events of the 1692 Salem witch trials mostly parallel those of the McCarthy trials. If you opposed the McCarthy investigations, you were accused of being a communist. If you opposed to the Salem Witch trials, you were accused of being a witch. Those accused suffered great consequences in both the Crucible and the McCarthy trials. As the McCarthy trials were still currently going through during the release of this play it made the play more effective and easier to relate to. Miller uses clever dramatic devices and a range of different techniques that help engage the audience and manipulate them into siding with different characters in the play and collecting important data that will help with understanding of the alternate people mentioned. The language and stage directions he uses create tension throughout the play and this all builds up to an unpredictable ending, which the audience has been lead on to throughout the play. As soon as Proctor makes his entrance his type of personality is immediately familiar with the audience via the stage directions. It reads on page 16 â€Å"Enter John Proctor. On seeing him Mary Warren leaps in fright† this creates the audience to comprehend that Proctor must have quite a overpowering character that outputs into Mary Warren having such a dramatic reaction to his presence. The first sign the audience receives of an altered relationship between Proctor and Abigail is when the stage directions read ‘ Abigail has stood as though on tiptoe, absorbing his presence, wide-eyed’ this creates an atmosphere of tension between the couplet and builds up to understanding of her blatant feelings for Proctor. But the stage directions read that he only ‘Glances’ at her, an act that makes it obvious that he does not seem to return her feelings for him, as he only carelessly ‘Glances’ as her whereas she seems to be love struck by his presence. The first line that them two communicate is Abigail saying ‘ Gah! I’d almost forgot how strong you are John Proctor!’ The word ‘Forgot’ instantaneously confirms the fact that there has been a past between the couple, which the audience can only wait to be informed certainly of. The following script after this quotation confirms the audiences suspicions by Proctor and Abigail discussing the relationship that they once had, and Abigail attempting unsuccessfully to rebuild a relationship only by Proctor turning her down firmly. Proctor’s relationship with Elizabeth is first introduced at the beginning of Act 2. When Elizabeth delivers Proctor his dinner, it reads that â€Å"She watch’s him eat† and when he compliments her cooking she â€Å"blush’s with pleasure†. I think this activity shows that Elizabeth is very keen on pleasing Proctor. The audience already know at this point of the extramarital affair that Proctor had with Elizabeth betraying his wife. So at the beginning of act 2 I pick up that Elizabeth is attempting greatly to hang onto their marriage even with their tinted history. As of their history there must be a decent amount of tension between the both and mistrust going on discretely. Proctor is portrayed as a good man but who has made very somewhat foolish mistakes in his past, which he tries to almost block out. When Elizabeth mentions his past betrayal in act two Proctor declares â€Å"I have not moved from here to there without I think to please you† I think this shows his immense remorse and that he truly is a good man at heart. In Act 1 when Proctor is questioned why he does not attend church anymore he replies; â€Å"I have trouble enough without I come five mile to hear him preach only hellfire and bloody damnation. Take it to heart, Mr Parris. There are many others who stay away from church these days because you hardly ever mention God anymore† this proves that he opposes the expenditures of Parris in the church and felt that the church was becoming too materialistic and drifted away from the original purpose of a church under the influence of Parris. When Parris states that there is â€Å"a faction and a party against him and all authority† Proctor states that he must join it. This declaration shocks everyone, as it is an offence to join such an anti-authority clique. This shows the extent of Proctor and Parris’s mutual hatred. His relationship with Parris tells me that he is one of a type whom stands up for his own view and does not delay to express his views. During the majority of Act 2 we are introduced with the dilemma of Elizabeth being accused of witchcraft. Both Proctor and Elizabeth know factually that its Abigail’s vengeful plotting that has got Elizabeth into this shocking situation. The audience already knows by now that Abigail is still madly love-struck with Proctor so they understand that it’s Abigail attempting to get rid of Elizabeth in hoping that she could take her place. If Proctor had not gone through with the past affair in the first place Elizabeth would not have ever been accused so in Proctor’s eyes its his fault and as a normal being he knows he now has to get his wife out of this situation on top of the fact that its his role as a husband to care for her and to keep her absent from upset. When Proctor attempts to influence Mary Warren into testifying in court on his behalf she informs him of the problem that Elizabeth will expose him of his lechery. Proctor states; â€Å"Good, then her saintliness is done with. We will slide together into our pit† this line shows his major courage and that he will risk his pure stainless name for his wife, a sign of trust and heroic behaviour. At this point his selfless motive is to get his wife out of the darkness of the court even if it does risk his name, or if worst comes to worse his life. As Mary Warren has informed Proctor of the girls pretence in court he sets out to relieve the court of their manipulative acts and to output in many more lives being saved, another heroic act.  In conclusion I think that Proctor’s analysis of himself is somewhat false as throughout the play he has shown signs of heroic occurrences and he has realised of his past mistakes and felt regret.

Taxation Versus Supply And Demand Elasticity - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 728 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2018/12/19 Category Finance Essay Type Research paper Level High school Tags: Consumer Rights Essay Taxation Essay Did you like this example? In inelastic good market, change in price does not cause any change in the consumption, for elastic goods changes in prices trigger great changes in the consumption patterns. An imposition of exercise tax by the government increases the levels of prices for the target good. The change in the quantity supplied and demanded depends on the elasticity on the both sides of supply and demand. For goods whose both supply and demand elasticity are elastic, little revenue can be gained since the buyer and consumers can alter their expenditures and supplies on the goods whose price has been increased by the taxes. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Taxation Versus Supply And Demand Elasticity" essay for you Create order In a case where the demand is inelastic and supply elastic only suppliers have a choice of changing their expenditure patterns and thus the tax imposition lies its burden heavily on consumers and not the producers. The producers can alter the level of production (supply level) to suit the market equilibrium. Consumers have no choice since they are addicted to the products thus little or no change in the consumption pattern once the tax is imposed. In this case a tax imposition or an increase in the rate of exercise tax will yield higher revenue compared to a case of elastic goods though the tax burden is heavily laid on the consumers. A case where both supply and demand are inelastic reaps of higher amount of revenue to the government once a tax is imposed. In this case tax burden is equally laid on producers and consumers for no one have an option to its choices on either production patterns or consumption patterns. When tax is imposed on the goods whose market equilibrium is indicated above the price changes from PE to a higher point say p1. Once this happened, the supply curve shifts backward for adjustments which alter the market equilibrium quantity from QE to a point back though along the consumption curve. In this case tax burden is equally laid on both consumers and producers. Imposition of exercise tax will shift PE to a higher level Tax imposition on butter will highly hurt consumers since the change it increases the prices and they cannot alter the quantity they demand. Only the suppliers can alter the quantity the supply, but thats impossible since the quantity demanded has not changed. As a consequence the tax imposition on guns would suit the government whose aim is not necessarily tax collection but cares on hurting the consumers (voters). CONSUMER PREFERENCES ON GOODS X and Y GIVEN THAT P(X) =P(Y), p(X) =price of x and p(Y) price of good Y. UTILITY FUNCTION, U (X,Y)=(X2+Y2). Utility function given describes a situation in which a bundle of X and Y goods have unit share of consumption. That is the consumer consumes one the same number of units at a given level of income (budget constraint). We trace whether the consumer preference for good X and Y satisfy the three axioms of consumer preference in utility. I) axiom of order or completeness- the utility function incorporates goods X and Y and thus it fulfills the axiom of completeness. Too, the consumer preference dictates for the choice of the most complete bundle- that for the two goods no good is left out. Ii) Axiom of transitivity the utility preference directs on the choice preferred by the customer that the higher level of utility indicate a better position for the consumer. Iii) Invariant transitivity from the consumer utility function for X and Y it is indicated that more bundles of X and Y can not provide a lesser utility. That is if there is an increase in the number of y and x then utility increases respectively. Therefore, the consumer preferences fulfill the three axioms of consumer preferences. Do the consumer preferences fulfill the decreasing marginal rate of substitution? Along the utility curve the marginal utility is always zero. I.e. the sum of partial derivatives of the utility is always zero. Therefore, using different points along the utility curve, we can construct a marginal rate of substitution curve. Whenever the consumer consumes more of y then for the utility to hold he/she consumes less of x and the same occurs whenever he/she consumes more of x, less of y. thus marginal rate of substitution occurs due diminishing marginal utility for consumption of more goods.